An Extension
I have no problems with a 2 years housemanship program. The current program is 20 months long (comprising of 5 rotations, each lasting 4 months), so this new proposal is merely a 4 months extension and not a full year's. At the same time, I think it is great that the Health Ministry recognises that there is a problem with the standard of young doctors in the country.
“We have observed that in the past few years, about three to five per cent of graduate medical officers do not get full registration because they have weaknesses in knowledge or skills,” he (Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek) told reporters before chairing his ministry’s post-Cabinet meeting.
Assuming that statement is true, then we indeed have a problem that needs dealing with. Unsupervised doctors roaming the ward seems a little dangerous to me. However, how does the new housemanship program differ from the old one and is it a solution to the problem? And more importantly, what does this imply for young doctors?
Old & new
In the old system, HOs undergo 5 different rotations, each lasting 4 months. In the event that a HO is deemed to require more training in a particular rotation, he/she would be asked to extend that rotation by up to 2 months. The new system is proposing that on top of the 5 rotations, HOs would also spend 4 months in A&E. If the problem at hand is that junior doctors are found to be weak in knowledge or skills (which I assume would be in the 5 disciplines that they have to work in), how will greater exposure in a different field help them? While exposure is a good thing and I believe A&E is an integral part of health care, will this extra rotation make doctors more competent? Just as medicine, surgery, paediatrics, orthopaedics and obstetrics & gynaecology differ greatly from each other, emergency medicine is an entirely different field. Getting trained in A&E does not make one more knowledgeable in medicine or surgery.
At the same time, is the length of housemanship training the root cause of the problem? Has the ministry looked into undergraduate medical education? Are our universities (both local and private) providing good standard of education? How about the quality of training HOs receive on the job? Are they given an opportunity to learn? Do their senior doctors guide them? Or are they merely the scut monkeys of the ward who bear the brunt of anyone's ill temper and who never receive training on the job? Are our junior doctors overworked such that they do not have time for study or are constantly too exhausted to learn anything?
Implications
Like I said before, this new system is merely a 4 months extension to what is already in place. What is interesting, however, is that doctors would be able to pursue their specialist courses or Master’s after serving two years' compulsory service compared to the current situation whereby they can only apply to further their studies after three years. I will not go into the prospects of getting into a Masters program because that would mean I will have to veer off topic and talk about meritocracy in local universities and as we all know, meritocracy is a sensitive subject in Malaysia. (Yes, strangely, it can be a sensitive subject. :P)
On a purely financial front, the ministry of health will also be recommending that MOs be put on the U43 grade after the 24 months housemanship and surely, that is a good thing.
At the same time, those of us who plan to complete our housemanship training abroad should be aware of the changes in housemanship training in Malaysia and the rotations we would need to complete is we don't want to end up coming back and having to work an extra 4 months as a HO in a particular field because we had not done that before. However, for some of us, it is unavoidable. I don't know how the internship/housemanship program work in Australia/New Zealand (and will not go into the whole residency thing in US because that is entirely different). In UK, FY1 comprises of 3 rotations in medicine and surgery (meaning you do 2 of 1 and 1 of the other), and FY2 comprises of 3 different rotations, this means, we get 5 different rotations... and I suspect we will have to complete the "outstanding" rotation as a HO on returning before progressing to MO.
In conclusion, there is a need to look at the new housemanship program and dwell deeper into whether it would solve the problem the ministry claims it would, and from a junior doctor's perspective, it isn't all that bad a thing after all.